insilentmeditation: (Default)

On a recent Sunday morning, I felt spiritually threatened. I don’t mean something as esoteric as being spiritually attacked on a metaphysical plane. No, this was more of an attack on my spirituality. I’m not sure the person who instigated that feeling had that intention. I hope not. Still, after the fact I find myself pondering the emotions evoked by the conversation. The setting had the potential for controversy, this I know. At least, I know that controversy may emerge over the coming weeks. You see, this was the orientation session for a study called “Living the Questions 2.0 – an Introduction to Progressive Christianity.” I did not, however, really expect controversy and feelings of inadequacy and threat to emerge during the orientation session.

 There were only four of us in the classroom – three of us consider ourselves to be “Progressive.” The fourth – a kind, caring and knowledgeable Christian – is probably someone who considers himself to be rather more traditional. And that’s fine. Wonderful, in fact, for the best class environment, in my opinion, is one in which we can all learn something new about our religion, one another, and ourselves. The goal of an orientation, however – at least, so I thought – is to meet one another, go over the guidelines and expectations of a course, and prepare for the class. This orientation did not go as expected.

 You should know that I was the facilitator for the orientation session. As we read through the guidelines provided by the creators of the study, we came upon the line that told us that the study was not meant for those who were adamant that the Bible is the “inerrant and infallible word of God.” In other words, those who are strict literalists might not be able to take the course, because it would be likely to challenge them too much; to anger them, for the study takes the stance that the Bible is not a literal document. Of course, since we were only in the orientation session, we have not gotten to the point where the presenters on the video discuss what they think the Bible actually is. However, from this point in the conversation, everything I attempted to explain was challenged. The individual who was challenging me, the study or Progressive Christianity – I’m not sure which, or if it was all three – made the comment that instead of this just being a study, it should be a group that takes action. For instance, going out during our social events and handing out “Books of John” to those in attendance. As a group, we agreed that if the study group were to evolve into a group that takes some kind of action initiated by our faith and our conviction, it would be a wonderful thing. I made the comment, however, that the first order of business was to do the study.

 That’s where things got rather “ugly,” at least to me. Suddenly, I was told that I was being close-minded. Solely, apparently, because I thought the purpose of having a Sunday School study was to have the study first, and what might come out of that study would be a benefit. One of the other individuals extrapolated that the other person was trying to make a point – that because I had made the comment that people often find the traditional church to be comprised of “close-minded” individuals, I was saying that as a Progressive I was more open-minded. The reality is that I am fully aware that by making such a distinction I am sometimes guilty of being close-minded. I am, after all, human. I have discussed this issue at length with others – I do find myself sometimes having trouble being non-judgmental when I feel I am being judged. I’m working on that. I’m praying about it constantly. And, of course, I suddenly felt I was being judged and found wanting, once again.

 Further discussion ensued around the subject of Communion. We all agreed that Communion was of absolute importance to Christians. The person who was challenging me brought out the verbiage we use in our church – that Communion is for “many.” Isn’t it, he asked, really just for the few, those who were true believers? I don’t want to get into the details of the discussion, I’m not sure I even remember them; I think we finally came to a consensus. However, even in this conversation, I felt a sense of personal attack. You see, when we did come to our agreement that Communion was of utmost importance, his comment to me was something to the effect that see, “you do stand for something.” As if I had said I don’t believe in anything in particular. That because I identify with Progressive Christianity, I am just floating through life with no purpose.

 I know that part of my problem is my discomfort with the traditional language of Christianity as it has come to be used by Bible-thumping evangelism. This is always my problem. I’m human, I have problems. I’m working on them, with God’s help. The reality is, of course, that I spent many years being spiritual outside of the Christian context. The words I choose may not evoke a Christian thought-pattern in those who are used to being only in the church. However, when I say “Spirit moves,” I mean “Holy Spirit.” I believe there is only one “Spirit” with a capital S. When I say, “God,” I mean the same God that is the only God who created the world. I believe there is only one God. One God, One Spirit, One Christ, Many Ways. That’s what I believe. Somehow, my belief in that seems to constitute some kind of heresy. Or something.

 I have been wrestling with this for almost three days now. What I believe; what I understand about God, the human relationship with God, the movement of Spirit and the person of Christ are unlikely to change – all I can change is the way I communicate that belief to others. I feel that if I use the language that has become so trite within the Christian church, seekers are often turned off. It is the language of judgment and dogma. I don’t think every organized Christian church or individual Christian is judgmental and dogmatic. What I am trying to say is that because many of them have been so, the non-churched, the non-spiritual and the non-Christian seeker has come to believe it to be so. It is a stereotype of the Christian, to be sure. It is a stereotype that needs to be challenged. I feel called to challenge that. If this one person in this one orientation class is an indication of what it means to challenge it, I’m not sure I’m up to it.

 And so, it comes to the crux of the matter. If I’m not up to it, how can I possibly be called to serve God as an ordained person? I have vacillated between thinking I’m called to be ordained and not; between thinking I’m called as Elder or Deacon;  between whether or not I’m called to be in the church at all. Here I am again. I am a fairly intelligent person who loves God and my fellow human being. I have been given gifts of writing, caring for others, administration and even the experiences that will allow me to help others who find themselves in situations similar to where I have been. And, yes, I am gifted with being quite open minded. Am I too open-minded? Some apparently think so. I don’t think God thinks so. I think God made me that way for a purpose. I just wish I could figure out that purpose.

 Right now, I feel lost, confused and rather alone. Thank God I have my children, my siblings and their families, and my friends. They should be sufficient, I suspect. These past few days, I am stopped in my tracks. What is it I’m seeking by pursuing my Master’s in Divinity? Why do I insist on starting up classes and study groups that are only attended by 2 to 6 individuals? Why do I stay in this local church, where people who think like me seem to be far outnumbered by those who do not? Why am I not satisfied going to work, making a decent living, saving for retirement (which I am not doing working where I am), writing poetry, reading a few books and having spirituality discussions over cups of delicious tea?

 Why am I not happy to just stop this never-ending quest and just settle into a life with someone who loves me just as I am? From there, maybe I could just write about my belief in One God, One Spirit, One Christ, Many Ways, and let someone with more fortitude and foundation do the work I keep trying to do, but cannot. Maybe, if I find someone to settle in with, I’ll discover that all I am called to do is just that. I sure wish God would get around to bringing them into my life.


insilentmeditation: (Default)

I suddenly know; suddenly understand something I have deluded myself with for a long time:  for years I have berated myself for not being good enough, beautiful enough, even woman enough to find True Love - that faerie prince to carry me off on a great White Steed and save me from a life of toil.  I blamed old musicals and faerie tales for laying a foundation of expectation that was impossible to meet.   I could not find my "one and only," I believed, because my expectations were too high.

Recently, I discovered - or perhaps uncovered - a deeper truth, and I am released from the unrealistic expectations.  The truth, you see, is that  I never expected to be saved from a life of toil; I never dreamed of a "Prince Charming!"  I let some overlay of this media-induced fantasy cloud my mind and become an excuse for ignoring that which I truly expected out of life, which was ALWAYS to live a meaningful life of my own!

I learned this by returning to some of the books I read as a small child - the Betsy-Tacy series by Maud Hart Lovelace..  These books were some of my very earliest reading, and I repeatedly read them as I grew older.  As I read a modern introduction to Heaven to Betsy, by Anna Quindlen, I realized the truth.  Quindlen points out the fact that Betsy and her sister Julia are encouraged by their parents, friends, teachers and one another in their pursuits of writing and performing.  The three main characters, Betsy, Tacy and Tib - who are really Maud and her friends - dream of writing, dancing and performing in circuses. In Heaven to Betsy, both Betsy and Tacy are surprised when they discover that their girlfriends dream only of marriage and children; not only are they surprised - they are appalled to find that the other girls have "hope chests" and spend time embroidering towels to place in the chests.  Betsy and Tacy like boys, but they do not see them as the purpose of their existence.

My new-found awareness brought with it the realization that all my favorite childhood book characters were independent young women:  Laura Ingalls, Nancy Drew, Cherry Ames, Jo March, Heidi.  All independent, intelligent girls who were unafraid.  What about the biographies I read so voraciously??  They were about Eleanor Roosevelt, Florence Nightingale, Clara Barton, Juliette "Daisy" Low, Anne Bonny and Mary Read.

No, it was not the fantasy of a prince in shining armour coming along to save me that fed my childish dreams; it was the dream of fulfilling a meaningful life as ME that gave me hope as a young girl.  At a young age, I must have known that a real man was one who could share my life with equal standing, one who had a meaningful life of his own to share with me.  Somewhere along the line, I became confused.  I thought I was supposed to want the young prince who would whisk me off my feet; when all along I just wanted to build up who I am, to reach my full potential.

I let somebody else's dream confuse me; I lost sight of myself, thus giving away a lot of time that should have been spent working on my own dreams.  It wasn't that my expectations were too high.  Rather, it was that in love, I had no expectations at all.  In my life, I forgot to pursue my dreams.  That is not to say that I have never desired love.  No.  On the contrary, I understand now that what I desired was what should be - that I find one who is an equal partner with a life of his very own.

Profile

insilentmeditation: (Default)
insilentmeditation

August 2022

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 16th, 2025 05:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios